Reuters 4chan is probably the cultural leader of the Internet. Zero Hedge is easily one of the most influential financial blogs. What they have in common is an adherence to the ideology of anonymity.
I know who I am," I said. Other people are also interested in knowing who you are.
Traven, The Death Ship The documentation of individual identity, whether by the state, private organizations or individuals, can be located within a broader set of questions concerning identity and anonymity. These in turn nestle within the wider field of the sociology of knowledge.
Current developments in the area of personal identification are a small part of broader changes in contemporary means of information collection, processing and communication. My interest in the topic grows out of research on the "new surveillance" which includes technologies such as computer matching and profiling, video cameras, electronic location monitoring and biometric devices which have the potential to identify individuals, independent of their will and even knowledge.
The extractive power of the new surveillance leads to value and policy questions such as "under what conditions is it right or wrong to collect various kinds of personal information with and without consent? The emphasis is on the cultural level --on normative expectations and justifications, more than on describing actual behavior.
I deal with individuals rather than group or organizational identities of course these maybe linked, as with infiltrators using pseudonyms working for false front intelligence agencies.
To ask about conditions and processes of identification also involves asking if sometimes implicitly about non-identification.
Identifiability at one extreme can be contrasted with anonymity at the other.
Describing a variety of kinds of identity knowledge and approaching these as distinct continua brings us closer to the messiness of the empirical world and suggests variation to be explained.
I will identify seven types of identity knowledge or ignorance. The requirement or at least possibility of identification, must be considered alongside of the requirement or possibility of non-identification.
I specify social settings where the opposing values of anonymity or identity are required by law, policy, or social expectations. The final section of the paper argues that the forms, uses and meaning of identity appear to be undergoing profound changes and discusses issues for research.
Among 7 broad types of identity knowledge are: Even though names such as John Smith may be widely shared, the assumption is made that there is only one John Smith born to particular parents at a given time and place. Even twins have different first names and birth times.
Name usually involves connection to a biological or social lineage and can be a key to a vast amount of other information. A name tends to convey a literal meaning e. This aspect of identification is usually the answer to the question "who are you?
The question of whether full, last, first, or no name is expected in social settings may appear to be a trivial issue that only a sociologist could love. But it is in fact the kind of little detail in which big social meanings may reside.
|Introduction[ edit ] As society progresses into the modern digital age it is becoming more and more essential to have an online identity alongside a real life one. For many these identities are representative of their best self, only sharing what they deem appropriate to a closed group; others over-share on personal accounts, occasionally alienating family and friends.|
|The topography of conventional teaching and learning is changing rapidly as educational budgets are decreasing.|
|Online identity: is authenticity or anonymity more important? | Technology | The Guardian||Technosapien[ edit ] A techno-sapien would be a slang term for a human being who is familiar and comfortable with technology. Someone who has the latest gadgets and electronic machinery would be techno-sapien.|
This involves location and "reach ability", whether in actual or cyberspace telephone number, mail or E-mail address, an account number.
But it does involve the ability to locate and take various forms of action such as blocking, granting access, delivering or picking up, charging, penalizing, rewarding or apprehending. It answers a "where" rather than a "who" question.
The "where" question need not be linked with the "who" question. Thus the identity of fugitives is known but not how they can be reached.
Even with both known they may be unreachable, as when there is no extradition treaty or they are otherwise protected. For example the U. Address need not be unique and can be complicated by multiple users of the same address.
A trusted intermediary and confidentiality are often involved here.How I created a new digital identity—and you can too. Patrick Howell O'Neill — Anonymity software.
Once the working computer is in my hands, the job is . Unless individuals and, more impor-tantly, governments can be held accountable, we lose all fraud, harassment, and identity theft are increasing. Already, damage estimates are measured in billions of dollars per year, but the human cost, in terms of anonymity is essential to ensure free speech on the Internet, and this outweighs any.
Internet identity (IID), also online identity or internet persona, whereby the offline-self informs the creation of a new online-self which in turn informs the offline-self through further interaction with those the individual first met online.
The future of online anonymity depends on how an identity management infrastructure is developed. We then looked at four arguments against online anonymity. The first was that with a lack of identity comes a lack of accountability, which often results in a lack of decency.
The first was that with a lack of identity comes a lack of accountability, which often results in a lack of decency. Part 1: The Quest for Anonymity Online By Lee Rainie, Sara Kiesler, Ruogu Kang and Mary Madden In word and deed, most Americans would like the ability to be anonymous and untracked online at least every once in a while.
Governments, from the United States to Communist China, are seeking to strip individuals of online anonymity.
Others are afraid of identity theft. The preceding, personal motives for anonymity are powerful, and the political reasons are no less so. But to blame internet anonymity for wrongs like child pornography is akin to blaming.