This paper explores the Davis-Moore thesis in greater detail and casts a light on the debate it has fostered. By understanding the forces behind its development, the reader gains a better grasp of many of the intricacies of the class systems that continue today in modern, industrialized societies.
Thursday, November 22, Analyzing Davis-Moore thesis. According to this thesis social stratification has positive David-moore thesis for the operation of a society.
It makes the society productive and efficient. According to Davis-Moore thesis, more important jobs shall offer greater rewards. Answering phone calls, bagging in a grocery store, or entering data on a computer are fairly easy and can be done by almost anyone but jobs such as web programming, accounting audition, or designing automobiles are more advance and require personnel with sufficient trainings and experience.
Greater rewards create motivation for people in the society to educate themselves. One thing that can lose its value in an egalitarian society is the quality of work.
According to Davis-Moore egalitarian society last as long as people let anyone perform any job. Workers in an equal society will have little incentive to do their best because everyone gets the same rewards regardless of any extra effort.
Why would corporate workers have any incentive for promotion when they would get the same rewards with less responsibility? And why would anyone want to work in a mine? But to what extent the stratification is beneficial? Melvin Tumin criticized Davis-Moore theses based on three reasoning: Second, disregarding the cast element of social stratification.
By studying Davis-Moore thesis one may object Tumin criticisms. First, the Davis-Moore thesis does not suggest what reward a society should give to any given job or how unequal the wealth should be distributed.
The thesis merely suggests more rewards for more important positions in order to distinguish between different talents and create incentives. Second, it is true that children of rich families are more privileged but given a fairly equal educational opportunity everyone can have a chance to progress.
Third, people need money in order to trade goods and services even in an egalitarian society. The only difference is the people in an egalitarian society are confined in limitation where as in meritocracy there is no limit.Abstract.
In Davis and Moore, following an earlier formulation by Davis, proposed a functional theory of stratification that was intended to account for what they contended was the “universal necessity” for social inequality in any social order.
Nov 22, · The Davis-Moore thesis has been made by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore in According to this thesis social stratification has positive consequences for the operation of a society.
The Davis-Moore Thesis Overview In , a publication known as Girl's Home Companion published an article in which it offered its view of how social and economic classes interact with one another. Order Details/Description Analyze the Davis-Moore thesis. Do you agree with Davis and Moore?
Does social stratification play an important function in society?
What examples can you think of that support the thesis? What examples can you think of that refute the thesis? Order Now We Can Also Assist You With Similar Orders At Highly Discounted Rates!!!
Davis-Moore Thesis The assertion that social stratification exists in every society because it has beneficial consequences for the operation of society. The greater the functional importance of a position the more rewards society attaches to it.
Davis-Moore thesis discusses and analyzes the social equality and inequality and explains why different people obtain different rewards for the jobs that they do (Macionis, ).