Second Year Medicine University of New South Wales Nargus is passionate about writing on topics that are relevant to the practice of medicine and aims to incorporate medical journalism in her future career as a doctor. Introduction The topic of euthanasia is one that is shrouded with much ethical debate and ambiguity. Various types of euthanasia are recognised, with active voluntary euthanasia, assisted suicide and physicianassisted suicide eliciting the most controversy. Euthanasia is currently illegal in all Australian states, refl ecting the status quo of most countries, although, there are a handful of countries and states where acts of euthanasia are legally permitted under certain conditions.
Diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme in January, Ms. Maynard was given 6 months to live.
Maynard in an essay posted on CNN. Arguing the Pros and Cons Although ASCO has taken no official position on physician-assisted suicide, in a position statement on high-quality end-of-life care,3 which neither supported nor condemned the practice, the Society recommended that physicians engage their patients in discussions about their concerns regarding how they might die; explain what comfort care will be provided; and assure patients that they will not be abandoned.
In NovemberIntelligence Squared U. To watch the full debate, go to http: Making someone die in a way that others approve, that he feels is anathema, is an odious form of tyranny.
Aiding dying needs to be tightly regulated, as any life or death matter does, from driving to surgery. However, although no one should be pressed into assisted dying, no one should be categorically denied that right. I do not want to die, but I am dying, and I want to die on my own terms.
Some people may find great meaning in those very final stages, whereas others may not be interested in finding that meaning. And from a nontheological point of view, it can be argued that the meaning people attach to that stage of life is an artifact of the human imagination.
Suicide responds to personal disintegration, whereas this precludes it. And it is about the limitations of medicine. Hospice, in fact, can impose an authoritarian, hard, paternalistic view that the hospice way of dying is the only way. Sulmasy, MD, PhD I am a physician, and part of my job is to help people die with dignity and in comfort.
We strongly support the right of patients to refuse treatments and believe that physicians have a duty to treat pain and other symptoms, even to the point of hastening death. However, empowering physicians to assist patients with suicide is quite another matter, striking at the heart not just of medical ethics, but also of ethics itself.
Now, is assisted suicide death with dignity? Proponents use the word in an attributed sense to denote the value others confer on them or the value they might even confer upon themselves.
Assisted suicide and euthanasia require us to accept that it is morally permissible to act with the specific intention of making a somebody into a nobody, to make the person dead. Intentions, not just outcomes, matter in ethics. Intending that somebody be turned into a nobody violates the fundamental basis of our interpersonal ethics, our intrinsic dignity.
Paradoxically, in physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, patients turn control over to physicians, who assess their eligibility and must provide the means.
And, further, since death obliterates all liberty, saying that respect for liberty justifies the obliteration of liberty undermines the value that we place on human freedom. PRO Peter Singer, MA, BPhil First, we believe that people should be the ones to decide for themselves whether they think that continued life is worthwhile for them or not.
Now, in fact, [the Northeast] region took a little step closer to that. It voted 41 to 31—a fairly clear majority. Of course, it still has to go to the Senate, where it would need the assent of the governor, so it still has some way to go. I want to quote one of the supporters of the bill whose name is Janet Colbert.
It is through compassion that I see how dangerous it is to license doctors to provide lethal drugs. When you normalize physician-assisted suicide, the underlying social dynamic changes.David Cameron has said he is worried about moves to legalise euthanasia although he would be happy for the Commons to debate the issue of assisted dying..
Speaking ahead of a controversial debate.
Easily one of the most controversial topics of our time, euthanasia tends to arouse emotional debate. However, there should be a very practical approach to this subject that puts the value of individual free will above the will of religion/5(4).
Euthanasia is a controversial issue that has attracted heated debate over the last two decades. Cultural, traditional and religious considerations contribute in the forming of individual and. Emotions were running high as vocal proponents for and against euthanasia debated the controversial issue at a public meeting in Wellington, with doctor culpability .
Assisted euthanasia is clearly controversial with well-meaning people on both sides of the issue. For those opposed, euthanasia has profound effects upon a person’s soul, as well as the morality of society. Controversial topics work well for speeches and essays, because they typically evoke strong opinions on both sides.
When you choose to speak or write about a controversial issue, you must learn to play devil’s advocate and become familiar with the arguments of the other side.